<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>ComicsPriceGuide.com Forums - Comic Grading Tips and Tricks - digital code-covering stickers - Messages</title>
<link>https://comicspriceguide.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=6755</link>
<description>ComicsPriceGuide.com Forums - Comic Grading Tips and Tricks - digital code-covering stickers - Messages</description>
<language>en-us</language>
<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
<generator>Jitbit AspNetForum</generator>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:15:31 GMT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:15:31 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<item>
<link>https://comicspriceguide.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=6755</link>
<title>Message from netstuffers</title>
<description><![CDATA[Yeah, if you can get it up cleanly it shouldn't be a huge penalty]]></description>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 13:15:31 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>https://comicspriceguide.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=6755</link>
<title>Message from Oxbladder</title>
<description><![CDATA[At one point the best the third party graders would give a book with the sticker removed was 9.6 or if that was the only defect then 9.8. I don't know if that has changed. So I always say expect at least a drop of .2 for that defect.]]></description>
<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2017 20:41:20 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<link>https://comicspriceguide.com/forum/messages.aspx?TopicID=6755</link>
<title>Message from glennsim</title>
<description><![CDATA[I assume the removal of the sticker that covers up the digital code is not considered a flaw?  Or at least doesn't take it below 9.4?]]></description>
<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2017 18:29:26 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
